✨ Introduce wallet exchange 🗃️

[matusdrobuliak66]

What do these changes do?

Currently, a project's connected wallet can go into a negative balance. This occurs because we have a policy to avoid interrupting users' computational jobs when their wallet reaches 0 credits—only dynamic services are stopped.

This PR:

• 🐛 Fixes a bug that prevents users from changing a project's wallet when the project is in DEBT.
  • A project is considered IN DEBT if the wallet connected to it has a balance below 0 credits.
  • Users can resolve this in two ways:
    • Top up credits to the wallet connected to the project.
    • Use a different wallet to pay off the project's debt.

Example:
The project transaction is in debt:

After the user pays off the debt using another wallet (triggering 2 new transactions between the wallets), the project transaction status changes from IN_DEBT to BILLED, unblocking the project.

Related issue/s

• closes Issues when changing wallet after running out of credits osparc-issues#1791

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 79.26421% with 62 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.49%. Comparing base (00d3690) to head (13f83ac).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7033      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.56%   87.49%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files        1629     1574      -55     
  Lines       63454    62085    -1369     
  Branches     2047     1794     -253     
==========================================
- Hits        55566    54324    -1242     
+ Misses       7552     7450     -102     
+ Partials      336      311      -25     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.80% <43.03%> (+1.03%)	⬆️
unittests	85.72% <79.26%> (-0.24%)	⬇️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	76.84% <ø> (ø)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	91.46% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
pkg_notifications_library	84.57% <ø> (ø)
pkg_postgres_database	88.31% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
pkg_service_integration	70.02% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	73.45% <0.00%> (-0.44%)	⬇️
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.38% <ø> (ø)
agent	96.45% <ø> (ø)
api_server	90.54% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.09% <ø> (ø)
catalog	90.66% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.24% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.26% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	93.18% <ø> (ø)
director	76.42% <ø> (ø)
director_v2	91.29% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	97.21% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	89.75% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	90.32% <20.00%> (-0.15%)	⬇️
invitations	93.44% <ø> (ø)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	92.66% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	89.17% <90.34%> (-0.35%)	⬇️
storage	89.57% <ø> (ø)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	86.30% <87.34%> (+0.37%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 00d3690...13f83ac. Read the comment docs.

[odeimaiz]

👌

[sanderegg]

All good, but the change in the efs-guardian. I would like to discuss this.

[bisgaard-itis]

All good from my side. Thanks a lot for the effort!

[sanderegg]

thanks!

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud