You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If the ice sheet community adopts a similar distinction (e.g., separating contiguous ice from "peripheral ice-sheet"), results from both communities could be compared, enhancing our understanding of methodological differences and allowing accross-community MIPs.
I think this is an interesting proposition and could lead to a good paper. These two communities keep most of their results separate. A secondary result of this non-overlap effort could be to isolate and report something on the overlaps from the two distinct communities with their often truly independent methods.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current D1 contains the following sentence:
I think this is an interesting proposition and could lead to a good paper. These two communities keep most of their results separate. A secondary result of this non-overlap effort could be to isolate and report something on the overlaps from the two distinct communities with their often truly independent methods.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: