You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I take a cursory look at the implementation of the binary_conv_layer , and i find that the bp process of the weight of the layer is inconsistent with the paper. This is for simplicity or mistake, i will try the effect.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, I have noticed that. I have implemented the gradient calculation as specified in the paper. But the final result did not show any improvement on ImageNet. Hence, i didn't update that code.
I'm also suffering from accuracy on ImageNet classification (darknet19 in binary weight from scratch).
What is your Top-1 accuracy?
I cannot even pass 20% Top-1 accuracy using binary weight only.
I take a cursory look at the implementation of the binary_conv_layer , and i find that the bp process of the weight of the layer is inconsistent with the paper. This is for simplicity or mistake, i will try the effect.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: