You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When you open the "HriPhysio/Stream/ros/rosStreamer.h" you find that the library cannot read the ROS2 files from the machine.
The Missing ROS header file error persists even though the header file exists and is in the correct directory. This error is related to the fact that the library cannot communicate properly with the ROS libraries in the local machine. The error can also be caused by the library requiring a ROS1 interface rather than ROS2.
There are also multiple errors when you try to build the library with "cmake .. -DENABLE_ROS=ON". Since the Cmakelists is written to work with ROS1.
Should the library be updated to use ROS2 rather than ROS1 or should we work with ROS1?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When you open the "HriPhysio/Stream/ros/rosStreamer.h" you find that the library cannot read the ROS2 files from the machine.
The Missing ROS header file error persists even though the header file exists and is in the correct directory. This error is related to the fact that the library cannot communicate properly with the ROS libraries in the local machine. The error can also be caused by the library requiring a ROS1 interface rather than ROS2.
There are also multiple errors when you try to build the library with "cmake .. -DENABLE_ROS=ON". Since the Cmakelists is written to work with ROS1.
Should the library be updated to use ROS2 rather than ROS1 or should we work with ROS1?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: