-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test[cartesian]: conditional xfail instead of two tests #1885
Conversation
tests/cartesian_tests/integration_tests/multi_feature_tests/test_code_generation.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
xfail
Sorry for the changes after review request. I just realized that pytest will - by default - not complain very loudly if |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Logic looks good!
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
1a161dc
to
de4f84f
Compare
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Follow-up from PR GridTools#1882 to merge test cases, which only differ in their expected outcome. With this PR, we'll have a single test case with conditional xfail instead.
de4f84f
to
31d50d3
Compare
xfail
Sorry for the back and forth. I was starting to mix things in this PR. Let's use this PR strictly for merging the two test cases and then talk in PR #1888 about enabling |
cscs-ci run |
Can someone with write access to give the green light here? Thanks 🙏 |
Description
Follow-up from PR #1882 to merge two test cases which only differed in the expected outcome. With this PR, we'll have one single test case with a conditional
xfail
as @havogt proposed in the GridTools slack channel.Related issue: #1881
Requirements
N/A