You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there a mechanism to maintain peak "names" through functions?
For example, the names of the elements in the Granges object from addReproduciblePeakSet seem to be completely discarded in the summarized experiment output of getMarkerFeatures.
The peak names are also discarded in the output of getGroupSE, but now are labeled as a string of "f" and the index.
Manually relabeling the peakSet to eliminate any possible duplicate names from addReproduciblePeakSet does not solve this.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Is there a mechanism to maintain peak "names" through functions?
For example, the names of the elements in the Granges object from addReproduciblePeakSet seem to be completely discarded in the summarized experiment output of getMarkerFeatures.
The peak names are also discarded in the output of getGroupSE, but now are labeled as a string of "f" and the index.
Manually relabeling the peakSet to eliminate any possible duplicate names from addReproduciblePeakSet does not solve this.
names(proj@peakSet) <- (proj@peakSet %>% {paste(seqnames(.), start(.), end(.), sep="_")})
I may be missing something but it is a bit cumbersome to manually relabel the outputs of getMarkerFeatures or getGroupSE.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions