Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change term request issue to GitHub form #876

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

jfy133
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfy133 jfy133 commented Nov 29, 2024

New PR due to a mangled branch on my fork.

Please see the original discussion here.

@jfy133 jfy133 requested a review from turbomam November 29, 2024 13:00
@jfy133
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jfy133 commented Nov 29, 2024

@turbomam you gave an original approval on this, could you read add for until we get the final OK for consistency

attributes:
label: Example
description: >
An example value for the term/slot
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we extend this description to include "the example value must follow the pattern/syntax described above."

Copy link
Member

@turbomam turbomam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approve, pending a resolution to @only1chunts suggestion about "the example value must follow the pattern/syntax described above."

@jfy133 jfy133 requested a review from only1chunts December 4, 2024 06:09
@jfy133
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jfy133 commented Dec 4, 2024

@only1chunts done! Please give ✅ of you're happy and I can merge

@jfy133 jfy133 merged commit e448445 into GenomicsStandardsConsortium:main Dec 4, 2024
3 checks passed
@jfy133 jfy133 deleted the term-request-form branch December 4, 2024 10:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants