Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Buff Jet Fuel No.3/A #18592

Open
4 tasks done
GrassyIce opened this issue Jan 1, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
4 tasks done

Buff Jet Fuel No.3/A #18592

GrassyIce opened this issue Jan 1, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
Status: Needs Discussion Issue requires developer/staff/admin discussion Suggestion Type: Balancing

Comments

@GrassyIce
Copy link

Your GTNH Discord Username

No response

Your Pack Version

2.7.2

Your Proposal

Buff Jet Fuel No.3 and Jet Fuel A.

Your Goal

Jet Fuel No.3 costs ~177k EU/B and Jet Fuel A costs ~393k EU/B. Compared with HOG which costs ~10k EU/B, jet fuels cost way more energy while their output is even lower than HOG. I suggest to reduce jet fuels' energy cost and buff their fuel value to make them useful.

Your Vision

Jet fuels provide an alternative way to turn coal and oil into combustion fuel. It's good to give player multiple choices instead of only HOG.

Final Checklist

  • I have searched this issue tracker and there is nothing similar already. Posting on a closed issue saying I like this change please reconsider adding it will prompt us to investigate and reopen it once we confirm your report.
  • I understand this change request may not attract enough attention and thus not be implemented.
  • I understand this change request may be rejected due to other community members think it's inappropriate.
  • I believe this feature would make the pack better.
@GrassyIce GrassyIce added Status: Triage Issue awaiting triage. Remove once this issue is processed Suggestion labels Jan 1, 2025
@Nockyx
Copy link
Contributor

Nockyx commented Jan 1, 2025

I've been aware of this for a while and already have a buff planned.

When you take into account not only the raw cost but the speed needed on the recipes, the overclocks you need to give make the power output have close to 20% efficiency, making it completelly unusable. While also having a very slow recipe time which guarantees an even lower output capability.

@chochem chochem added Type: Balancing Status: Needs Discussion Issue requires developer/staff/admin discussion and removed Status: Triage Issue awaiting triage. Remove once this issue is processed labels Jan 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Needs Discussion Issue requires developer/staff/admin discussion Suggestion Type: Balancing
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants