GOLEM Ontology
+Metadata
+-
+
- + IRI + +
-
+
https://ontology.golemlab.eu/
+
+ - + Title + +
GOLEM Ontology
+ - + Description + +
Golem Ontology for Narrative and Fiction
+GOLEM v1
+Ontology of fiction and narrative, developed as an extension of CIDOC-CRM and LRMoo, and aligned to DOLCE-Lite-Plus.
+Narrative phenomena can be viewed as interconnected systems in which various components influence one another. Understanding the properties of narratives requires analyzing them in relation to each other and within their broader context, rather than in isolation (Pianzola, 2018). Formal ontologies provide a structured and systematic approach to representing the essential elements of storytelling. By capturing relevant concepts, constraints, and interrelationships among narrative elements, ontology ensures a consistent and explicit representation of the narrative domain.
+In literary studies, traditional quantitative and probabilistic methods often struggle to account for the semantic richness and intensional qualities of texts (Ciotti, 2016). In contrast, ontology modeling highlights the complexities of narrative structure, making these elements explicit and computable.
+The GOLEM project developed an ontology that models narratives and fiction independently of their specific domains. To achieve this, the project seeks to identify a common ground that defines how key elements of narrative structure—such as events, characters, social relationships, and settings—interrelate. By employing a modularization approach, GOLEM will create a comprehensive library of modules that encapsulate these narrative components, including modules for characters, relationships, events, settings, and narrative inference.
+The detailed description of each module can be read in the GitHub.
+Furthermore, the ontology contributes to comparative studies by providing a structured framework for analyzing narratives across different cultural contexts. It enhances our understanding of cumulative cultural evolution in narratives, allowing for a more nuanced exploration of how narratives evolve and grows cumulatively over time (Pianzola et al., 2020).
+References
+Abbott, H. P. (2019). Narrativity. In P. Hühn et al. (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg University.
+Bartalesi, V., Meghini, C., & Metilli, D. (2017). A conceptualisation of narratives and its expression in the CRM. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 12(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2017.10005083
+Bekiari, C., Bruseker, G., Canning, E., Doerr, M., Michon, P., Ore, C.-E., Stead, S., & Velios, A. (2024, October). Conceptual reference model (CIDOC CRM), version 7.3 (Tech. rep.). CIDOC CRM-SIG.
+Carroll, N. (2015). Interpretation. In The Routledge companion to philosophy of literature (pp. 302–312). Routledge.
+Chaturvedi, S., Srivastava, S., Daume III, H., & Dyer, C. (2015). Modeling dynamic relationships between characters in literary novels. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.09376. http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.09376
+Ciotti, F. (2016). Toward a formal ontology for narrative. MATLIT: Materialidades da Literatura, 4(1), 29-44.
+Doerr, M., Kritsotaki, A., Rousakis, Y., Hiebel, G., & Theodoridou, M. (2023, October). CRMsci: The scientific observation model (Tech. rep.). CIDOC CRM-SIG.
+Jannidis, F. (2019). Character. In P. Hühn et al. (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg University.
+Kukkonen, K. (2019). Plot. In P. Hühn et al. (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg University.
+Lea, K. M. (1962). Italian popular comedy: A study in the commedia dell'arte, 1560–1620 with special reference to the English stage (Vol. 1). Russell & Russell.
+Mika, P., & Gangemi, A. (2016). Descriptions of social relations. Benefits, 1, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/benefits1010014
+Pannach, F. (2023, July). “Orpheus came to his end by being struck by a thunderbolt”: Annotating events in mythological sequences. In Proceedings of the 17th Linguistic Annotation Workshop (LAW-XVII) (pp. 10-18).
+Pannach, F. A. K. (2024). Narrative echoes across time and space.
+Pannach, F., Sporleder, C., May, W., Krishnan, A., & Sewchurran, A. (2021). Of lions and Yakshis. Semantic Web, 12(2), 219-239.
+Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the folktale. University of Texas Press.
+Pianzola, F. (2018). Looking at narrative as a complex system: The proteus principle. In Narrating complexity (pp. 101-122).
+Pianzola, F., Acerbi, A., & Rebora, S. (2020). Cultural accumulation and improvement in online fan fiction. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 2723). CEUR-WS. org.
+Ryan, M.-L. (2019). Space. In P. Hühn et al. (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg University.
+Sanfilippo, E. M., & Ferrario, R. (2024). D3.1—Observations modeling: State of the art.
+Schöch, C., Hinzmann, M., Röttgermann, J., Dietz, K., & Klee, A. (2022). Smart modelling for literary history. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 16(1), 78–93.
+Zgoll, A., Cuperly, B., & Cöster-Gilbert, A. (2023). In search of Dumuzi: An introduction to holistic narratology. In The shape of stories (pp. 285-350). Brill.
+Zgoll, C. (2020). Myths as polymorphous and polystratic Erzählstoffe. In Mythische Sphärenwechsel: Methodisch neue Zugänge zu antiken Mythen in Orient und Okzident (pp. 9-82).
+
Classes
+F1 Work + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://iflastandards.info/ns/lrm/lrmoo/F1_Work
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+ Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (movie, 2001)+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | +
+
|
+
+ In Domain Of + | +
+
|
+
+ In Range Of + | +
+
|
+
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
F2 Expression + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://iflastandards.info/ns/lrm/lrmoo/F2_Expression
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+ The text of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone + |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + E73 Information Object + c + + | +
+ In Domain Of + | +
+
|
+
+ In Range Of + | +
+
|
+
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
E13 Attribute Assignment + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E13_Attribute_Assignment
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+ Assigning the topic “friendship” to the work Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone.+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + E7 Activity + c + + | +
+ In Domain Of + | +
+
|
+
+ In Range Of + | +
+
|
+
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
E1 CRM Entity + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E1_CRM_Entity
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This class comprises all things in the universe of discourse of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. +It is an abstract concept providing for three general properties: +Identification by name or appellation, and in particular by a preferred identifier +Classification by type, allowing further refinement of the specific subclass to which an instance belongs +Attachment of free text and other unstructured data for the expression of anything not captured by formal properties +All other classes within the CIDOC CRM are directly or indirectly specialisations of E1 CRM Entity. |
+
+ Equivalentclass + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
+ In Domain Of + | +
+
|
+
+ In Range Of + | +
+
|
+
+ Super Class Of + | +
+
|
+
E28 Conceptual Object + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E28_Conceptual_Object
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This class comprises non-material products of our minds and other human produced data that have become objects of a discourse about their identity, circumstances of creation, or historical implication. The production of such information might have been supported by the use of technical devices such as cameras or computers. +Characteristically, instances of this class are created, invented or thought by someone, and then may be documented or communicated between persons. Instances of E28 Conceptual Object have the ability to exist on more than one particular carrier at the same time, such as paper, electronic signals, marks, audio media, paintings, photos, human memories, etc. +They cannot be destroyed. They exist as long as they can be found on at least one carrier or in at least one human memory. Their existence ends when the last carrier and the last memory are lost. |
+
+ Super Class Of + | ++ + G15 Fandom + c + + | +
E54 Dimension + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E54_Dimension
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This class comprises quantifiable properties that can be measured by some calibrated means and can be approximated by values, i.e. points or regions in a mathematical or conceptual space, such as natural or real numbers, RGB values, etc. +An instance of E54 Dimension represents the empirical or theoretically derived quantity, including the precision tolerances resulting from the particular method or calculation. The identity of an instance of E54 Dimension depends on the method of its determination because each method may produce different values even when determining comparable qualities. For instance, the wingspan of a bird alive or dead is a different dimension. Thermoluminescence dating and Rehydroxylation [RHX] dating are different dimensions of temporal distance from now, even if they aim at dating the same object. The method of determination should be expressed using the property P2 has type (is type of). Note that simple terms such as “diameter” or “length” are normally insufficient to unambiguously describe a respective dimension. In contrast, “maximum linear extent” may be sufficient. +The properties of the class E54 Dimension allow for expressing the numerical approximation of the values of instances of E54 Dimension adequate to the precision of the applied method of determination. If the respective quantity belongs to a non-discrete space according to the laws of physics, such as spatial distances, it is recommended to record them as approximations by intervals or regions of indeterminacy enclosing the assumed true values. For instance, a length of 5 cm may be recorded as 4.5-5.5 cm, according to the precision of the respective observation. Note, that comparability of values described in different units depends critically on the representation as value regions. +Numerical approximations in archaic instances of E58 Measurement Unit used in historical records should be preserved. Equivalents corresponding to current knowledge should be recorded as additional instances of E54 Dimension, as appropriate. |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + E1 CRM Entity + c + + | +
+ In Domain Of + | ++ + P43i is dimension of + op + + | +
+ In Range Of + | ++ + P43 has dimension + op + + | +
E55 Type + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E55_Type
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This class comprises concepts denoted by terms from thesauri and controlled vocabularies used to characterize and classify instances of CIDOC CRM classes. Instances of E55 Type represent concepts, in contrast to instances of E41 Appellation which are used to name instances of CIDOC CRM classes. +E55 Type provides an interface to domain specific ontologies and thesauri. These can be represented in the CIDOC CRM as subclasses of E55 Type, forming hierarchies of terms, i.e. instances of E55 Type linked via P127 has broader term (has narrower term): E55 Type. Such hierarchies may be extended with additional properties. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ See Tag categories on AO3.+ |
+
+ In Domain Of + | +
+
|
+
+ In Range Of + | +
+
|
+
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
E70 Thing + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E70_Thing
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This general class comprises discrete, identifiable, instances of E77 Persistent Item that are documented as single units, that either consist of matter or depend on being carried by matter and are characterized by relative stability. +They may be intellectual products or physical things. They may, for instance, have a solid physical form, an electronic encoding, or they may be a logical concept or structure. |
+
+ In Domain Of + | +
+
|
+
+ In Range Of + | +
+
|
+
E73 Information Object + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E73_Information_Object
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This class comprises identifiable immaterial items, such as poems, jokes, data sets, images, texts, multimedia objects, procedural prescriptions, computer program code, algorithm or mathematical formulae, that have an objectively recognizable structure and are documented as single units. The encoding structure known as a “named graph” also falls under this class, so that each “named graph” is an instance of E73 Information Object. +An instance of E73 Information Object does not depend on a specific physical carrier, which can include human memory, and it can exist on one or more carriers simultaneously. +Instances of E73 Information Object of a linguistic nature should be declared as instances of the E33 Linguistic Object subclass. Instances of E73 Information Object of a documentary nature should be declared as instances of the E31 Document subclass. Conceptual items such as types and classes are not instances of E73 Information Object, nor are ideas without a reproducible expression. |
+
+ Super Class Of + | ++ + F2 Expression + c + + | +
E7 Activity + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E7_Activity
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This class comprises actions intentionally carried out by instances of E39 Actor that result in changes of state in the cultural, social, or physical systems documented. +This notion includes complex, composite, and long-lasting actions such as the building of a settlement or a war, as well as simple, short-lived actions such as the opening of a door. |
+
+ In Domain Of + | ++ + P16 used specific object + op + + | +
+ In Range Of + | ++ + P16i was used for + op + + | +
+ Super Class Of + | ++ + E13 Attribute Assignment + c + + | +
E89 Propositional Object + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E89_Propositional_Object
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This class comprises immaterial items, including but not limited to stories, plots, procedural prescriptions, algorithms, laws of physics or images that are, or represent in some sense, sets of propositions about real or imaginary things and that are documented as single units or serve as topic of discourse. +This class also comprises items that are “about” something in the sense of a subject. In the wider sense, this class includes expressions of psychological value such as non-figural art and musical themes. However, conceptual items such as types and classes are not instances of E89 Propositional Object. This should not be confused with the definition of a type, which is indeed an instance of E89 Propositional Object. |
+
+ In Domain Of + | ++ + P67 refers to + op + + | +
+ In Range Of + | ++ + P67i is referred to by + op + + | +
+ Super Class Of + | +
+
|
+
Geographical place + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/CommonSenseMapping.owl#geographical-place
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A non-physical place, generically dependent on some (physical) geographical object. |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + non physical place + c + + | +
+ Restriction + | +
+
+
+
+ generic dependent
+ op
+
+
+ some
+
+
+ G13 Narrative Location
+ c
+
+
+ + + + |
+
non physical place + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/CommonSenseMapping.owl#non-physical-place
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A figure (e.g. Italy) for non-physical (i.e. socially- or cognitively-constructed) places. Non-physical places generically depend on physical places. |
+
+ Super Class Of + | +
+
|
+
endurant + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#endurant
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +The main characteristic of endurants is that all of them are independent essential wholes. This does not mean that the corresponding property (being an endurant) carries proper unity, since there is no common unity criterion for endurants. Endurants can 'genuinely' change in time, in the sense that the very same endurant as a whole can have incompatible properties at different times. To see this, suppose that an endurant say 'this paper' has a property at a time t 'it's white', and a different, incompatible property at time t' 'it's yellow': in both cases we refer to the whole object, without picking up any particular part of it. Within endurants, we distinguish between physical and non-physical endurants, according to whether they have direct spatial qualities. Within physical endurants, we distinguish between amounts of matter, objects, and features. |
+
+ In Domain Of + | +
+
|
+
+ In Range Of + | +
+
|
+
non physical object + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#non-physical-object
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Formerly known as description. A unitary endurant with no mass (non-physical), generically constantly depending on some intentional agent, on some communication act, and indirectly on some agent participating in that act. Either descriptions (in the current sense), and concepts are non-physical objects. |
+
particular + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#particular
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +AKA 'entity'. Any individual in the DOLCE domain of discourse. The extensional coverage of DOLCE is as large as possible, since it ranges on 'possibilia', i.e all possible individuals that can be postulated by means of DOLCE axioms. Possibilia include physical objects, substances, processes, qualities, conceptual regions, non-physical objects, collections and even arbitrary sums of objects. Extensions of DOLCE included in this ontology also feature 'situations' (qualified reifications of states of affairs). |
+
+ In Domain Of + | +
+
|
+
+ In Range Of + | +
+
|
+
perdurant + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#perdurant
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Perdurants (AKA occurrences) comprise what are variously called events, processes, phenomena, activities and states. They can have temporal parts or spatial parts. For instance, the first movement of (an execution of) a symphony is a temporal part of it. On the other side, the play performed by the left side of the orchestra is a spatial part. In both cases, these parts are occurrences themselves. We assume that objects cannot be parts of occurrences, but rather they participate in them. Perdurants extend in time by accumulating different temporal parts, so that, at any time they are present, they are only partially present, in the sense that some of their proper temporal parts (e.g., their previous or future phases) may be not present. E.g., the piece of paper you are reading now is wholly present, while some temporal parts of your reading are not present any more. Philosophers say that endurants are entities that are in time, while lacking however temporal parts (so to speak, all their parts flow with them in time). Perdurants, on the other hand, are entities that happen in time, and can have temporal parts (all their parts are fixed in time). |
+
+ In Domain Of + | +
+
|
+
+ In Range Of + | +
+
|
+
+ Super Class Of + | ++ + G5 Narrative Event + c + + | +
state + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#state
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Within stative occurrences, we distinguish between states and processes according to homeomericity: sitting is classified as a state but running is classified as a process, since there are (very short) temporal parts of a running that are not themselves runnings. In general, states differ from situations because they are not assumed to have a description from which they depend. They can be sequenced by some course, but they do not require a description as a unifying criterion. On the other hand, at any time, one can conceive a description that asserts the constraints by which a state of a certian type is such, and in this case, it becomes a situation. Since the decision of designing an explicit description that unifies a perdurant depends on context, task, interest, application, etc., when aligning an ontology do DLP, there can be indecision on where to align a state-oriented class. For example, in the WordNet alignment, we have decided to put only some physical states under 'state', e.g. 'turgor', in order to stress the social orientedness of DLP. But whereas we need to talk explicitly of the criteria by which we conceive turgor states, these will be put under 'situation'. Similar considerations are made for the other types of perdurants in DOLCE. A different notion of event (dealing with change) is currently investigated for further developments: being 'achievement', 'accomplishment', 'state', 'event', etc. can be also considered 'aspects' of processes or of parts of them. For example, the same process 'rock erosion in the Sinni valley' can be conceptualized as an accomplishment (what has brought the current state that e.g. we are trying to explain), as an achievement (the erosion process as the result of a previous accomplishment), as a state (if we collapse the time interval of the erosion into a time point), or as an event (what has changed our focus from a state to another). In the erosion case, we could have good motivations to shift from one aspect to another: a) causation focus, b) effectual focus, c) condensation d) transition (causality). If we want to consider all the aspects of a process together, we need to postulate a unifying descriptive set of criteria (i.e. a 'description'), according to which that process is circumstantiated in a 'situation'. The different aspects will arise as a parts of a same situation. |
+
+ In Domain Of + | ++ + state-of + op + + | +
+ In Range Of + | ++ + has-state + op + + | +
+ Super Class Of + | ++ + G3 Psychological State + c + + | +
Time Interval + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#time-interval
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A time-interval or time-span in a narrative refers to a duration or a specific time point during which events take place. It encompasses the beginning, end, and the length of time between them, allowing for the placement of actions on a chronological timeline. It can represent broad periods, like an era, or specific moments, like a single date or time. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ July 31, 1980 (Harry Potter's birthday)+ |
+
+ In Domain Of + | ++ + duration of + op + + | +
+ In Range Of + | ++ + duration + op + + | +
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
agentive social object + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/ExtendedDnS.owl#agentive-social-object
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A social object that is assumed to internally represent a plan. Since social objects are dependent on physical ones, it is not trivial to interpret the local sense in which a social object 'internally represents' a plan. For example, an institution can have the plan to promote or regulate some activities, but this is possible by means of the powers conferred to it by some legal system, through its representatives, and that plan has to be executed by means of the physical agents that 'act for' the institution. |
+
+ Super Class Of + | ++ + G1 Character + c + + | +
course + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/ExtendedDnS.owl#course
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A concept that classifies (in particular, it 'sequences') perdurants (processes, events, or states), as a component of some description. Courses are the descriptive counterpart of perdurants, and, since perdurants have endurants as participants, they are usually the function of some role. |
+
+ In Domain Of + | +
+
|
+
+ In Range Of + | +
+
|
+
+ Super Class Of + | +
+
|
+
description + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/ExtendedDnS.owl#description
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A description is a social object which represents a conceptualization (e.g. a mental object or state), hence it is generically dependent on some agent and communicable. Descriptions define or use concepts or figures, are expressed by an information object and can be satisfied by situations. The typology of descriptions is still preliminary. |
+
+ In Domain Of + | +
+
|
+
+ In Range Of + | +
+
|
+
+ Super Class Of + | +
+
|
+
role + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/ExtendedDnS.owl#role
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Also known as 'functional role'.A concept that classifies (in particular, it is 'played by') endurants, as used in some description. Roles are the descriptive counterpart of endurants, and, as endurants participate in perdurants, they usually have courses as modal targets (see).The typology of roles is still preliminary. |
+
+ In Domain Of + | +
+
|
+
+ In Range Of + | +
+
|
+
+ Super Class Of + | +
+
|
+
situation + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/ExtendedDnS.owl#situation
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A situation is a social object that appears in the domain of an ontology only because there is a description whose components can 'carve up' a view (setting) on that domain. A situation has to satisfy a description (see below for ways of defining the satisfies relation), and it has to be setting for at least one entity.In other words, it is the ontological counterpart (with due local differences or restrictions) of settings (situations from SC, contexts, episodes, states of affairs, structures, configurations, cases, etc.).A perdurant is usually the only mandatory constituent of a setting.Two descriptions of a same situation are possible, otherwise we would result in a solipsistic ontology. The time and space (and possibly other qualities) of a situation are the time and space of the perdurants in the setting. |
+
+ In Domain Of + | +
+
|
+
+ In Range Of + | +
+
|
+
+ Super Class Of + | ++ + G12 Setting + c + + | +
social relationship + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/ExtendedDnS.owl#social-relationship
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A social description defining roles for the interaction of rational agents. |
+
+ Restriction + | +
+
+
+
+ involves
+ op
+
+
+ min
+ 2
+ + + + |
+
+ Super Class Of + | ++ + G4 Social Relationships + c + + | +
region + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/DOLCE-Lite.owl#region
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +We distinguish between a quality (e.g., the color of a specific rose), and its value (e.g., a particular shade of red). The latter is called quale, and describes the position of an individual quality within a certain conceptual space (called here quality space) Gardenfors (2000). So when we say that two roses have (exactly) the same color, we mean that their color qualities, which are distinct, have the same position in the color space, that is they have the same color quale. |
+
+ In Domain Of + | ++ + temporal location of + op + + | +
+ In Range Of + | ++ + temporal location + op + + | +
concept + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#concept
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +AKA C-Description. A non-physical object that is defined by a description s, and whose function is classifying entities from a ground ontology in order to build situations that can satisfy s. |
+
+ In Domain Of + | ++ + d-used-by + op + + | +
+ In Range Of + | ++ + d-uses + op + + | +
Seq + c +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Seq
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Is Defined By + | ++ The RDF Concepts Vocabulary (RDF) + | +
+ Description + | +The class of ordered containers. |
+
+ Super Class Of + | +
+
|
+
G0 Character-Stoff + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G0_Character-Stoff
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +The concept of Character-Stoff is derived from the German term Erzählstoff, referring to narrative material (Zgoll et al, 2020). Character-Stoff represents the infinite potential of a character across all known and unknown variations, extending beyond any singular depiction. It encompasses all possible versions, features, actions, and roles of a character across time and media, while remaining open to reinterpretation and transformation. This polymorphous nature allows for endless modifications. Thus, Character-Stoff is an ever-evolving, inexhaustible phenomenon, impossible to outline in full. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Harry Potter. +The Harry Potter Stoff includes not only the known versions from books, films, and fan works, but also potential +reinterpretations in future media or cultural contexts. Any imaginary version of Harry Potter could be potentially +true, as the Character-Stoff allows for infinite variations and reinterpretations.+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | +
+
|
+
+ Restriction + | +
+
+
+
+ P130i features are also found on
+ op
+
+
+ some
+
+
+ G1 Character
+ c
+
+
+ + + + |
+
G10 Narrative Function + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G10_Narrative_Function
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A narrative function refers to the functional roles that narrative units play within a story. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Proppian functions+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + role + c + + | +
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
G11 Narrative Role + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G11_Narrative_Role
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A narrative role refers to the functional roles that characters play within a story. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Narrator, dramatis personae from Propp Ontology or commedia dell’arte.+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + role + c + + | +
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
G12 Setting + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G12_Setting
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Setting is the narrative universe in which a story unfolds, encompassing the spatial, cultural, and social contexts that shape characters and events. It defines the situation and surroundings relevant to the narrative. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ The Wizarding World for the Harry Potter novels. +The “setting of “Eveline” [by J. Joyce] is early 20th-century lower-middle-class Dublin" (Ryan, 2015).+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + situation + c + + | +
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
G13 Narrative Location + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G13_Narrative_Location
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Narrative location is the environment where events occur, as the spatial frames that represent the immediate surroundings of action. It is non-physical places shaped by narrative contexts, which may derive from real locations but exist as imaginative entities within the narrative. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ England in the Harry Potter series functions as a non-physical place shaped by the narrative, generically dependent +on England in the real world.+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + non physical place + c + + | +
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
G14 Narrative-Stoff + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G14_Narrative-Stoff
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Narrative Stoff refers to the fundamental materials that form the basis of a narrative. It contains a sequence of events that could be manifested across various narratives and mediums. This concept highlights the potential variations of these narrative elements within different contexts. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Apollo and Zephyros love Hyacinthus. While Apollo and Hyacinthus are playing a game with a discus, +Zephyros uses the wind to change its direction, causing the discus to hit Hyacinthus and resulting in +his death. Afterward, Hyacinthus transforms into a flower.+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | +
+
|
+
+ Restriction + | +
+
+
+
+ P130i features are also found on
+ op
+
+
+ some
+
+
+ G7 Fabula
+ c
+
+
+ + + + |
+
G15 Fandom + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G15_Fandom
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A fandom is a group of fans who share a common interest in a particular work or topic, such as a book, movie, and engage in fan activities like discussions or creating fan works. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ “Harry Potter - J. K. Rowling” on AO3.+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | +
+
|
+
+ Restriction + | +
+
+
+
+ P130i features are also found on
+ op
+
+
+ some
+
+
+ F1 Work
+ c
+
+
+ + + + |
+
G16 Object + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G16_Object
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +An object refers to a persistent item that plays a significant role in the story but is not a character. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ The Elder Wand carried by Harry Potter.+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | +
+
|
+
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
G17 Character Feature + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G17_Character_Feature
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Character traits or features are stable aspects defining a character's identity, including biographical (e.g., birth, death), physical (e.g., hair color, scars), and psychological features (e.g., personality). |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + G2 Feature + c + + | +
G18 Textual Feature + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G18_Textual_Feature
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Textual features are the elements or characteristics found in a narrative or fictions. These features include narrative style, like the tone and writing techniques employed by the author, as well as the point of view (POV) that determines the perspective from which the story is told, such as first-person or third-person. Textual features also contain the voice reflecting authors' attitude, the diction referring to the authors' choice of words, etc.. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Stream of consciousness, first-person perspective+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + G2 Feature + c + + | +
G1 Character + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G1_Character
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +“Character is a text- or media-based figure in a storyworld, usually human or human-like,” understood through readers’ knowledge of real people (Jannidis, 2019). Readers attribute to characters mental states such as intentions and beliefs, and consider them to engage in actions. Characters can have specific functional roles within narratives, such as protagonist or antagonist, influencing how readers perceive and interpret the story. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Harry Potter+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | +
+
|
+
+ In Domain Of + | ++ + appears in + op + + | +
+ In Range Of + | ++ + has character + op + + | +
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
G2 Feature + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G2_Feature
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A feature in the context of narrative refers to a distinct element or characteristic that contributes to the structure and meaning of a story. Features can include character traits and textual elements. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Style, theme, literary devices+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + E1 CRM Entity + c + + | +
+ In Range Of + | ++ + has feature + op + + | +
+ Super Class Of + | +
+
|
+
G3 Psychological State + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G3_Psychological_State
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A psychological state is a temporal mental condition that may change over time but possesses relatively constant qualities, such as emotions, motivations, beliefs, and goals. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Ron’s jealousy (Yule Ball).+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + state + c + + | +
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
G4 Social Relationships + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G4_Social_Relationship
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +“A social description defining roles for the interaction of cognitive agents (DOLCE-Lite-Plus, 2005)” or dlp:agentive-social-objects. Characters are involved in social relationships. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Romantic love between Ron and Hermione.+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + social relationship + c + + | +
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
G5 Narrative Event + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G5_Narrative_Event
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A narrative event is a change of state or progression that supports the story, defined by its temporality and sequentiality. It includes two main types of change of states: The first type covers any change of state presented in the narrative, and the second highlights significant changes that disrupt expectations or mark key moments in the story (Hühn, 2019). Additionally, there are process events, which involve dynamic actions like movement or perception that do not lead to lasting changes in the character’s state. Events can be either external, like actions taken by characters, or psychological, involving changes in thoughts or feelings, which are distinct from a psychological state. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ "There was a clatter as the basilisk fangs cascaded out of Hermione’s arms (process event). +Running at Ron (process event), she flung them around his neck and kissed him full on the mouth (change of state). +Ron threw away the fangs and broomstick (process event) he was holding and responded with such enthusiasm +that he lifted Hermione off her feet (change of state)."+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
G6 Relationship Role + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G6_Relationship_Role
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A relationship role refers to the functional role a character plays within the context of their interactions with other characters, serving as a descriptive counterpart to their enduring qualities, with characters participating in events (perdurants). |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Lover (both Ron and Hermione in the “Ron and Hermione” romantic relationship). +Beloved (both Ron and Hermione in the “Ron and Hermione” romantic relationship).+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + role + c + + | +
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
G7 Fabula + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G7_Fabula
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Fabula refers to the events of the narrative in chronological and causal order prior to any verbalization thereof (Abbott, 2019). It represents the underlying structure of the story or what exactly happens. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Text: +“1) I used to love this boy, and (2) he used to love me. +(3) But I failed, he has been dead for years, and I am a god… +(4) We were in a sunny field playing, as we both loved sports. He grabbed a diskus... +He ran laughing to catch it. He should have gotten it, but in those last moments it felt like years.... +(5) A slight change in the wind destroyed everything. Instead of catching the diskus,it hit his head... +I tried everything. Everything. Magic, all forms of healing. (6) But I could not bring him back. +Me, the god of healing, failed…(7) and in its place a flower, more beautiful than royal phonecian, was born… +(8) I dared Zephyros, the West Wind, who also loved Hyacinthus. I dared him to take him away from me. +My greed caused his death.” + +Fabula: +H1: [Apollo] loves [Hyacinthus] (durative-constant) +H2: Zephyros loves Hyacinthus (durative-constant) +H3: [Hyacinthus] loves [Apollo] (durative-initial) +H4: [Apollo and Hyacinthus] play the game of discus (single-event) +H5: Zephyros is the West Wind. (durative-constant) +[H6: Zephyros causes the wind to change. (single-event)] +H7: The discus hits Hyacinthus (single-event) +H8: Apollo fails to save Hyacinthus (single-event) +H9: [Hyacinthus] is dead (durative-resultative) +[H10: Hyacinthus is a flower (durative-resultative)]+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + | +
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
G8 Syuzhet + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G8_Syuzhet
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Syuzhet: Often translated as "plot," syuzhet encompasses how events are presented and organized within a narrative (Kukkonen, 2019; Abbott, 2019). It involves the specific ordering and techniques used to articulate the story, reflecting the author’s design and structuration to achieve particular effects. Additionally, it includes how narrative discourse reorders story events to create meaning for readers. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Text: +“1) I used to love this boy, and (2) he used to love me. +(3) But I failed, he has been dead for years, and I am a god… +(4) We were in a sunny field playing, as we both loved sports. He grabbed a diskus... +He ran laughing to catch it. He should have gotten it, but in those last moments it felt like years.... +(5) A slight change in the wind destroyed everything. Instead of catching the diskus,it hit his head... +I tried everything. Everything. Magic, all forms of healing. (6) But I could not bring him back. +Me, the god of healing, failed…(7) and in its place a flower, more beautiful than royal phonecian, was born… +(8) I dared Zephyros, the West Wind, who also loved Hyacinthus. I dared him to take him away from me. +My greed caused his death.” + +Syuthet: +H4: [Apollo and Hyacinthus] play the game of discus (single-event) +H6: Zephyros causes the wind to change. (single-event) +H7: The discus hits Hyacinthus (single-event) +H8: Apollo fails to save Hyacinthus (single-event) +H9: [Hyacinthus] is dead (durative-resultative) +H10: Hyacinthus is a flower (durative-resultative) +H1: [Apollo] loves [Hyacinthus] (durative-constant) +H3: [Hyacinthus] loves [Apollo] (durative-initial) +H2: Zephyros loves Hyacinthus (durative-constant) +H5: Zephyros is the West Wind. (durative-constant)+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | ++ + | +
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
G9 Narrative Unit + c +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/G9_Narrative_Unit
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +A narrative unit is the minimal or fundamental component of narrative structure that articulates actions, states, or thematic elements within a story. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ One example of a narrative unit is hylemes, which are narrative statements composed of a subject, +predicate, and optional object. They represent the fundamental building blocks of any narrative structure, +describing actions, states, or information present within a narrative (Zgoll et al., 2023; Pannach, 2023), +such as "Apollo loves Hyacinthus." Another example is events showcasing Proppian functions (Propp, 1968). +For instance, the function "Villain causes harm or injury" can be illustrated by the event where Zephyros +causes Hyacinthus's death. Another example is motifs representing recurring thematic elements, +such as the transformation of Hyacinthus into a flower.+ |
+
+ Sub Class Of + | +
+
|
+
+ Restriction + | +
+
|
+
Object Properties
+R3 is realised in + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://iflastandards.info/ns/lrm/lrmoo/R3_is_realised_in
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+ The work Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (F1) is realised in the text of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows +(Rowling, 2007) (F2).+ |
+
+ Sub Property Of + | ++ + P130 shows features of + op + + | +
+ Domain + | ++ + F1 Work + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + F2 Expression + c + + | +
R3i realises + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://iflastandards.info/ns/lrm/lrmoo/R3i_realises
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Sub Property Of + | ++ + P130i features are also found on + op + + | +
+ Domain + | ++ + F2 Expression + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + F1 Work + c + + | +
R5 has component + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://iflastandards.info/ns/lrm/lrmoo/R5_has_component
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+ Text of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Rowling, 2007) (F2) has component a paragraph in Harry Potter +and the Deathly Hallows (F2).+ |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + F2 Expression + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + F2 Expression + c + + | +
R5i is component of + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://iflastandards.info/ns/lrm/lrmoo/R5i_is_component_of
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Domain + | ++ + F2 Expression + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + F2 Expression + c + + | +
P127 has broader term + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P127_has_broader_term
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This property associates an instance of E55 Type with another instance of E55 Type that has a broader meaning. +It allows instances of E55 Types to be organised into hierarchies. This is the sense of “broader term generic (BTG)” as defined in ISO 25964-2:2013 (International Organization for Standardization 2013). +This property is transitive. This property is asymmetric. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ "Friendship" (E55) has broader term "topic" (E55).+ |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + E55 Type + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E55 Type + c + + | +
P127i has narrower term + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P127i_has_narrower_term
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Domain + | ++ + E55 Type + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E55 Type + c + + | +
P130 shows features of + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P130_shows_features_of
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Super Property Of + | ++ + R3 is realised in + op + + | +
+ Domain + | ++ + E70 Thing + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E70 Thing + c + + | +
P130i features are also found on + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P130i_features_are_also_found_on
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Indicates that a Stoff variation exhibits features of the Stoff, such as a Character-Stoff or Narrative-Stoff. |
+
+ Super Property Of + | ++ + R3i realises + op + + | +
+ Domain + | ++ + E70 Thing + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E70 Thing + c + + | +
P140 assigned attribute to + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P140_assigned_attribute_to
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This property associates an instance of E13 Attribute Assignment with the instance of E1 CRM Entity about which it made an attribution. The instance of E1 CRM Entity plays the role of the domain of the attribution. +The kind of attribution made should be documented using P177 assigned property of type (is type of property assigned). |
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + E13 Attribute Assignment + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E1 CRM Entity + c + + | +
+ Inverse Of + | ++ + P140i was attributed by + inv + + | +
P140i was attributed by + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P140i_was_attributed_by
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Domain + | ++ + E1 CRM Entity + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E13 Attribute Assignment + c + + | +
+ Inverse Of + | ++ + P140 assigned attribute to + inv + + | +
P141 assigned + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P141_assigned
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This property associates an instance of E13 Attribute Assignment with the instance of E1 CRM Entity used in the attribution. The instance of E1 CRM Entity here plays the role of the range of the attribution. The kind of attribution made should be documented using P177 assigned property of type (is type of property assigned). |
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + E13 Attribute Assignment + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E1 CRM Entity + c + + | +
P141i was assigned by + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P141i_was_assigned_by
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Domain + | ++ + E1 CRM Entity + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E13 Attribute Assignment + c + + | +
P16 used specific object + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P16_used_specific_object
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + E7 Activity + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E70 Thing + c + + | +
P16i was used for + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P16i_was_used_for
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + E70 Thing + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E7 Activity + c + + | +
P177 assigned property of type + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P177_assigned_property_of_type
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+ The topic assignment for *Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone* (E13) *assigned property type* “topic” (E55).+ |
+
+ Sub Property Of + | ++ + P2 has type + op + + | +
+ Domain + | ++ + E13 Attribute Assignment + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E55 Type + c + + | +
P177i is type of property assigned + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P177i_is_type_of_property_assigned
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This property associates an instance of E13 Attribute Assignment with the type of property or relation that this assignment maintains to hold between the item to which it assigns an attribute and the attribute itself. Note that the properties defined by the CIDOC CRM also constitute instances of E55 Type themselves. The direction of the assigned property of type is understood to be from the attributed item (the range of property P140 assigned attribute to) to the attribute item (the range of the property P141 assigned). More than one property type may be assigned to hold between two items. +A comprehensive explanation about refining CIDOC CRM concepts by E55 Type is given in the section “About Types” in the section on “Specific Modelling Constructs” of this document. |
+
+ Sub Property Of + | ++ + P2i is type of + op + + | +
+ Domain + | ++ + E55 Type + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E13 Attribute Assignment + c + + | +
P2 has type + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P2_has_type
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This property allows sub-typing of CIDOC CRM entities –a form of specialisation – through the use of a terminological hierarchy, or thesaurus. +The CIDOC CRM is intended to focus on the high-level entities and relationships needed to describe data structures. Consequently, it does not specialise entities any further than is required for this immediate purpose. However, entities in the isA hierarchy of the CIDOC CRM may by specialised into any number of sub-entities, which can be defined in the E55 Type hierarchy. E41 Appellation, for example, may be specialised into “e-mail address”, “telephone number”, “post office box”, “URL”, etc., none of which figures explicitly in the CIDOC CRM class hierarchy. A comprehensive explanation about refining CIDOC CRM concepts by E55 Type is given in the section “About Types” in the section on “Specific Modelling Constructs” of this document. +This property is a shortcut for the path from E1 CRM Entity through P41i was classified by, E17 Type Assignment, P42 assigned to E55 Type. |
+
+ Super Property Of + | ++ + P177 assigned property of type + op + + | +
+ Domain + | ++ + E1 CRM Entity + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E55 Type + c + + | +
P2i is type of + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P2i_is_type_of
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This property allows sub-typing of CIDOC CRM entities –a form of specialisation – through the use of a terminological hierarchy, or thesaurus. +The CIDOC CRM is intended to focus on the high-level entities and relationships needed to describe data structures. Consequently, it does not specialise entities any further than is required for this immediate purpose. However, entities in the isA hierarchy of the CIDOC CRM may by specialised into any number of sub-entities, which can be defined in the E55 Type hierarchy. E41 Appellation, for example, may be specialised into “e-mail address”, “telephone number”, “post office box”, “URL”, etc., none of which figures explicitly in the CIDOC CRM class hierarchy. A comprehensive explanation about refining CIDOC CRM concepts by E55 Type is given in the section “About Types” in the section on “Specific Modelling Constructs” of this document. +This property is a shortcut for the path from E1 CRM Entity through P41i was classified by, E17 Type Assignment, P42 assigned to E55 Type. |
+
+ Super Property Of + | ++ + P177i is type of property assigned + op + + | +
+ Domain + | ++ + E55 Type + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E1 CRM Entity + c + + | +
P43 has dimension + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P43_has_dimension
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This property records an instance of E54 Dimension of some instance of E70 Thing. +In the case that the recorded property is a result of a measurement of an instance of E18 Physical Thing, this property is a shortcut of the more fully developed path from E18 Physical Thing through P39i was measured by, E16 Measurement, P40 observed dimension to E54 Dimension. +It offers no information about how and when an E54 Dimension was established, nor by whom. Knowledge about an instance of E54 Dimension need not be the result of a measurement; it may be the result of evaluating data or other information, which should be documented as an instance of E13 Attribute Assignment. +An instance of E54 Dimension is specific to an instance of E70 Thing. |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + E70 Thing + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E54 Dimension + c + + | +
P43i is dimension of + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P43i_is_dimension_of
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Domain + | ++ + E54 Dimension + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E70 Thing + c + + | +
P67 refers to + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P67_refers_to
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+ Hyleme “Voldemort casts the "Avada Kedavra" curse” (G9) refers to the event “Harry heard the high voice shriek +as he too yelled his best hope to the heavens, pointing Draco’s wand: “Avada Kedavra! ” “Expelliarmus!”” (G5).+ |
+
+ Sub Property Of + | ++ + topObjectProperty + op + + | +
+ Domain + | ++ + E89 Propositional Object + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E1 CRM Entity + c + + | +
P67i is referred to by + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P67i_is_referred_to_by
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Sub Property Of + | ++ + topObjectProperty + op + + | +
+ Domain + | ++ + E1 CRM Entity + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + E89 Propositional Object + c + + | +
duration + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/CommonSenseMapping.owl#duration
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+ The Battle of Hogwarts (G5) has *duration* several hours (time-interval).+ |
+
+ Sub Property Of + | ++ + temporal location + op + + | +
+ Domain + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + Time Interval + c + + | +
duration of + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/CommonSenseMapping.owl#duration-of
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Indicates that a narrative event has a specific duration. |
+
+ Sub Property Of + | ++ + temporal location of + op + + | +
+ Domain + | ++ + Time Interval + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
temporally overlaps + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/TemporalRelations.owl#temporally-overlaps
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+ Ron’s jealousy (G3) temporally overlaps with Hermione’s arrival at the ball with Viktor Krum (G5).+ |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
generic dependent + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/DOLCE-Lite.owl#generic-dependent
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
generic location + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/DOLCE-Lite.owl#generic-location
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
generic location of + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/DOLCE-Lite.owl#generic-location-of
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
generically dependent on + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/DOLCE-Lite.owl#generically-dependent-on
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
participant + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/DOLCE-Lite.owl#participant
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + endurant + c + + | +
participant in + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/DOLCE-Lite.owl#participant-in
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + endurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
proper part + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/DOLCE-Lite.owl#proper-part
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
proper part of + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/DOLCE-Lite.owl#proper-part-of
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
d-used-by + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#d-used-by
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Descriptions can d-use (descriptively use) concepts or figures, provided that used ones are defined by some description. |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + | +
+ Range + | ++ + description + c + + | +
d-uses + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#d-uses
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Descriptions can d-use (descriptively use) concepts or figures, provided that used ones are defined by some description. |
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + description + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + | +
involved in + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#involved-in
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+ Ron (G1) involved in the romantic love between Ron and Hermione (G4).+ |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + endurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + description + c + + | +
involves + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#involves
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + description + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + endurant + c + + | +
modal target + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#modal-target
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +The relation between roles and courses. Modal target subrelations can be seen as 'reifications' of the operators of modal logics. |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + role + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + course + c + + | +
modal target of + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#modal-target-of
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +The relation between roles and courses. Modal target subrelations can be seen as 'reifications' of the operators of modal logics. |
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + course + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + role + c + + | +
played-by + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#played-by
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This is the immediate relation between roles and endurants. A role selects the position (function, use, relevance, ...) of an endurant within a context (s-description). Roles can be ordered, interdependent, at different layers. etc. |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + role + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + endurant + c + + | +
plays + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#plays
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +This is the immediate relation between roles and endurants. A role selects the position (function, use, relevance, ...) of an endurant within a context (s-description). Roles can be ordered, interdependent, at different layers. etc. |
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + endurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + role + c + + | +
predecessor + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#predecessor
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
satisfied by + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#satisfied-by
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + description + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + situation + c + + | +
satisfies + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#satisfies
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+ The setting of "Wizarding community rivalries during the Triwizard Tournament" (G12) satisfies the work Harry Potter +and the Goblet of Fire (F1).+ |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + situation + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + description + c + + | +
sequenced-by + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#sequenced-by
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+ The fabula or syuzhet of Battle of Hogwarts in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (J. K. Rowling, 2007) +sequences a series of individual events+ |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + course + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
sequences + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#sequences
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+ The fabula of Battle of Hogwarts in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Rowling, 2007) (G7) sequences the Battle of +Hogwarts (G5).+ |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + course + c + + | +
setting + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#setting
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Links a narrative setting to various elements such as location, time, character, object, or event. |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + situation + c + + | +
setting for + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#setting-for
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Links a narrative setting to various elements such as location, time, character, object, or event. |
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + situation + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
successor + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#successor
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + particular + c + + | +
used-by + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#used-by
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Describes a character's use of an object in a narrative event. |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + endurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + endurant + c + + | +
uses + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/ExtendedDnS.owl#uses
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Describes a character's use of an object in a narrative event. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Harry Potter (G1) uses the Elder Wand (G16) in the Battle of Hogwarts.+ |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + endurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + endurant + c + + | +
has-state + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/FunctionalParticipation.owl#has-state
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Participation in a state. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Ron in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (G1) has state “jealousy” during the event Yule Ball (G3).+ |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + endurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + state + c + + | +
state-of + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/FunctionalParticipation.owl#state-of
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Domain + | ++ + state + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + endurant + c + + | +
participant place + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/SpatialRelations.owl#participant-place
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+ The Quidditch World Cup match (G5) has participant place Quidditch World Cup Campsite (G13).+ |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + endurant + c + + | +
participant place of + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/SpatialRelations.owl#participant-place-of
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + endurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
follows + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/TemporalRelations.owl#follows
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
precedes + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/TemporalRelations.owl#precedes
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
temporal location + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/TemporalRelations.owl#temporal-location
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Describes the specific time point at which a narrative event occurs. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Yule Ball in *Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire* (movie, 2005) (G5) has temporal location Christmas Eve (time-interval).+ |
+
+ Super Property Of + | ++ + duration + op + + | +
+ Domain + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + region + c + + | +
temporal location of + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/TemporalRelations.owl#temporal-location-of
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Describes the specific time point at which a narrative event occurs. |
+
+ Super Property Of + | ++ + duration of + op + + | +
+ Domain + | ++ + region + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
temporally included in + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/TemporalRelations.owl#temporally-included-in
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
temporally includes + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/TemporalRelations.owl#temporally-includes
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +
+
|
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Domain + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + perdurant + c + + | +
member + op +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#member
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Is Defined By + | ++ The RDF Schema vocabulary (RDFS) + | +
+ Description + | +A member of the subject resource. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ The fabula of Battle of Hogwarts in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows orders events as follows: +rdf:_1 Voldemort casts the "Avada Kedavra" curse. +rdf:_2 Harry casts "Expelliarmus" +rdf:_3 The spells collide in midair, etc.+ |
+
appears in + op +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/appearsIn
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Indicates that a character appears in a work. |
+
+ Example + | +
+ Harry Potter (G1) appears in Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (movie, 2001) (F1).+ |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + G1 Character + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + F1 Work + c + + | +
has character + op +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/hasCharacter
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Indicates that a character appears in a work. |
+
+ Domain + | ++ + F1 Work + c + + | +
+ Range + | ++ + G1 Character + c + + | +
has feature + op +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/hasFeature
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Indicates that a narrative or character has certain features. |
+
+ Example + | +
+
|
+
+ Range + | ++ + G2 Feature + c + + | +
is feature of + op +
+IRI | +
+ https://ontology.golemlab.eu/isFeatureOf
+ |
+
---|---|
+ Description + | +Indicates that a narrative or character has certain features. |
+
Annotation Properties
+date + ap +
+IRI | +
+ http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/date
+ |
+
---|
description + ap +
+IRI | +
+ http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/description
+ |
+
---|
title + ap +
+IRI | +
+ http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title
+ |
+
---|
example + ap +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#example
+ |
+
---|
notation + ap +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#notation
+ |
+
---|
pref label + ap +
+IRI | +
+ http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#prefLabel
+ |
+
---|
Namespaces
+-
+
- dc +
-
+
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
+
+ - dlp +
-
+
http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dlp/
+
+ - gc +
-
+
https://ontology.golemlab.eu/
+
+ - owl +
-
+
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
+
+ - rdf +
-
+
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
+
+ - rdfs +
-
+
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
+
+ - skos +
-
+
http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
+
+
Legend
++ c + | +Classes | +
+ op + | +Object Properties | +
+ ap + | +Annotation Properties | +
social object + c +
+http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/ExtendedDnS.owl#social-object
+A catch-all class for entities from the social world. It includes agentive and non-agentive socially-constructed objects: descriptions, concepts, figures, collections, information objects. It could be equivalent to 'non-physical object', but we leave the possibility open of 'private' non-physical objects.
+-
+
+ G0 Character-Stoff
+ c
+
+
+ -
+
+ G15 Fandom
+ c
+
+
+ -
+
+ G16 Object
+ c
+
+
+
+