Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discrepancy in results buoy in wave #272

Open
ewoudVL13 opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Discrepancy in results buoy in wave #272

ewoudVL13 opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@ewoudVL13
Copy link

ewoudVL13 commented Nov 14, 2024

Hello everybody,
I am currently working on an model comparison between MoorDyn V2 and OrcaFlex.
I ran a model of a line with 2 fixed end points in a regular wave and the results there are almost the same.
image
Now I use the same wave input or a buoy with a center of mass that is lowered. (input files below)(wave amplitude 4m, period 8.33s)
buoy_mass.txt
water_grid.txt
wave_frequencies.txt
But here something strange happens. The buoy is moving backwards. The usefful results are shown below.
image
image
image
The buoy does not lay flat and for a basic calculation no cd or ca coefficients are included.
When only a current acts on the buoy the models show the same results.
Any ideas?
The buoy has a center of mass 2.67m above the bottom of the buoy. I think this is correctly implemented no?

@RyanDavies19
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @ewoudVL13,

Sorry for the slow response here. It seems like your buoy has no hydrodynamic properties (Rod: Cd, Ca, CdEnd, and CaEnd). Is this intentional? My guess is this is causing the discrepancies.

@ewoudVL13
Copy link
Author

@RyanDavies19 Yeah it was done on purpose to see how the to programs act when only buoyancy is in the play.

@RyanDavies19
Copy link
Collaborator

@ewoudVL13 I see the note now, not sure how I missed that 🤦‍♂️

The approach with the rod and body looks mostly right. However if you want the center of mass to be 2.67m from the bottom of the buoy, then the buoy Za needs to be -2.67m. When something is attached to a Boyd, its positions are defined in
the body's reference frame rather than the global frame. So Za = -2.67 means end Za is 2.67m below the body (center of mass).

@ewoudVL13
Copy link
Author

ewoudVL13 commented Nov 25, 2024

Yeah indeed I found that during the simulations. Dou you know something about the influence of wave height or wave period on the results?
The data still doesn't show the same trends even with the right buoy.

@RyanDavies19
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm not sure I can give specifics, but without the hydrodynamic forcing I would think the buoy would drift towards the anchor point rather than stay where it is. It could also be good to check decay tests of the buoy with no mooring, to make sure the dynamics are matching between the two (if results differ when including hydro stuff, then setting the water density to zero will determine if the kinematics are right). With no mooring and a cylindrical shape, pitch and heave should be sufficient.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants