You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Unfortunately, DCT/DST types V-VIII are currently not supported, which is mentioned in the docs without any justification. However, recently I needed to have such opportunity.
I suggest the following:
If DCT/DST types V-VIII are inefficient compared to complex transforms under any circumstances, this should be just mentioned in the docs.
If DCT/DST types V-VIII are hard to implement, this should be mentioned in the docs.
Otherwise, please consider support types V-VIII.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the 26 years since FFTW was first released, I think you may be the first person to actually request these transform types — the need for them is not very common, so it's never been on my radar screen to implement them.
(You could implement them on top of FFTW, however, in the same way that DCT/DST I-IV leverage the rest of FFTW. In principle, I don't think they are especially harder to implement than types I-IV, though the fact that V-VIII are based on odd-size DFTs eliminates the simplest radix-2 algorithms I think, but it is a nontrivial amount of work for a transform that few people need.)
Hello,
Unfortunately, DCT/DST types V-VIII are currently not supported, which is mentioned in the docs without any justification. However, recently I needed to have such opportunity.
I suggest the following:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: