-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CfP closed – update website #992
Conversation
Preview available
|
Most notably, there is a card in the centre of the main page that talks about the CfP but I don't know what to replace it with 🤷. |
src/content/pages/faq.mdx
Outdated
<li>**3 February 2025:** Call for Proposals (CfP) closes (<b>Extension</b>)</li> | ||
</ul> | ||
|
||
<ul className="milestone-todo"> | ||
<li><strike>**27 January 2025:** Call for Proposals (CfP) closes</strike></li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<li>**3 February 2025:** Call for Proposals (CfP) closes (<b>Extension</b>)</li> | |
</ul> | |
<ul className="milestone-todo"> | |
<li><strike>**27 January 2025:** Call for Proposals (CfP) closes</strike></li> | |
<li>**27 January 2025:** Call for Proposals (CfP) closes</li> | |
<li>**3 February 2025:** Extension of Call for Proposals (CfP) closes</li> | |
</ul> | |
<ul className="milestone-todo"> |
Or remove the extension part completely and pretend that we only had this later date.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it makes sense to keep info about the fact that the CFP was extended. See the new version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So you removed the initial closing date for the cfp on purpose now? - Just checking. Not objecting.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, because the CfP didn't close on the 27th. Only on the 3rd (after an extension).
Co-authored-by: Cyril Bitterich <cebit-github@gunnet.de>
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is just the one thing with double checking if the first cfp end-date was removed on purpose. Rest looks good to me.
I used a bit of common sense and my judgment to figure out what needed to be changed but I might be wrong here, so please check my changes ;)