You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
System you've never been retreated from where less than 7 factions are present
If none:
System you have been retreated from where less than 7 factions are present
If none:
System with the lowest influence on a "non-native" faction (faction whom that system is not their home system)
Currently the expansion report lumps the first two in the same bucket when they should be separated, at this time I don't have a clear way to resolve this since the APIs don't list "all factions ever present" or similar to check for retreats and pulling all past data to check for a faction having been present in the past is doable... but would come with a significant impact to performance and hit EliteBGS's API harder than I'd feel comfortable doing. (I don't want to negatively impact EliteBGS by being abusive in my api calls)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When expanding the order of operations is:
If none:
If none:
Currently the expansion report lumps the first two in the same bucket when they should be separated, at this time I don't have a clear way to resolve this since the APIs don't list "all factions ever present" or similar to check for retreats and pulling all past data to check for a faction having been present in the past is doable... but would come with a significant impact to performance and hit EliteBGS's API harder than I'd feel comfortable doing. (I don't want to negatively impact EliteBGS by being abusive in my api calls)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: