Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add NEXUS location codes #7

Closed
tjd2002 opened this issue May 8, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #8
Closed

Add NEXUS location codes #7

tjd2002 opened this issue May 8, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #8

Comments

@tjd2002
Copy link
Contributor

tjd2002 commented May 8, 2019

In many cases, NEXUS appointments at a given location use the same location codes (and have the same appointment availability) as GOES appointments at the same location.

However in at least one case (Blaine, WA), there are different location codes for the two appointment types. I have not gone through the entire list, but the list of NEXUS locations is available at:

https://ttp.cbp.dhs.gov/schedulerapi/locations/?temporary=false&inviteOnly=false&operational=true&serviceName=NEXUS

And the list of GOES locations is at:

https://ttp.cbp.dhs.gov/schedulerapi/locations/?temporary=false&inviteOnly=false&operational=true&serviceName=Global%20Entry

@Drewster727
Copy link
Owner

@tjd2002 thanks! Are NEXUS/SENTRI/FAST appointments using the same appointment scheduler as GOES? I don't want to add verbiage for that if this tool can't find appointments for those as well. That make sense?

@tjd2002
Copy link
Contributor Author

tjd2002 commented May 8, 2019

Check my PR #8; I updated the docs as best I could.

Thank you for the awesome tool!

@tjd2002
Copy link
Contributor Author

tjd2002 commented May 8, 2019

But, short answer. Yes! So your tool is actually useful to anyone looking to make those appointments as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants