You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 16, 2024. It is now read-only.
I have trained the model using a custom dataset, where the GT_depth maps were generated using colmap. However after training, and running the inference notebook, this is what I get as output, the predicted depth maps seems more to be as normal maps. @DrSleep any idea or guidance on the matter ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since you are using a custom dataset, make sure that its structure is identical to NYUD since that the dataset which the training example is based upon. Concretely, make sure that you set depth_scale and ignore_depth to the correct values in your configuration. Defaults are here
I have trained the model using a custom dataset, where the GT_depth maps were generated using colmap. However after training, and running the inference notebook, this is what I get as output, the predicted depth maps seems more to be as normal maps.
@DrSleep any idea or guidance on the matter ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: