Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 16, 2024. It is now read-only.

Predicted depth maps aren't as expected. #10

Open
onizuka94 opened this issue Jul 2, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

Predicted depth maps aren't as expected. #10

onizuka94 opened this issue Jul 2, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@onizuka94
Copy link

I have trained the model using a custom dataset, where the GT_depth maps were generated using colmap. However after training, and running the inference notebook, this is what I get as output, the predicted depth maps seems more to be as normal maps.
@DrSleep any idea or guidance on the matter ?
plot_mod

@DrSleep
Copy link
Owner

DrSleep commented Jul 6, 2020

hard to say without any colourbars. Does the depth metric become better as the training progresses?

@onizuka94
Copy link
Author

@DrSleep nope, The RMSE is stuck at 0.8xxx .

@DrSleep
Copy link
Owner

DrSleep commented Jul 9, 2020

0.8xxx by itself does not tell me anything.

Since you are using a custom dataset, make sure that its structure is identical to NYUD since that the dataset which the training example is based upon. Concretely, make sure that you set depth_scale and ignore_depth to the correct values in your configuration. Defaults are here

@13sunmin
Copy link

How do you get the segmentation and depth of field results from the trained model?

@13sunmin
Copy link

13sunmin commented Mar 6, 2021

I've trained the model.
How can I get the inference notebook.Can you help me?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants