abicio or abjicio?

[fiapps]

I was going to open an issue to complain that 54f8927 had changed abiciate to abjiciate in the antiphon for the Benedictus on the feast of St. Cecilia, but then I discovered usage is divided about 50-50 in the repo. Should we be preferring one of these two forms? I thought we were preferring the former, but now I'm not so sure.

The question also regards other words derived from iacio. Abicio is considered more classical, so it's what the 1961 editio typica used, but it's also likely to be mispronounced, because people who haven't studied Latin won't know that the single i should be pronounced as if it were two. Thus former breviary editors, who were more concerned with helping readers than being classical, wrote abjicio.

[APMarcello3]

Closed by ccd42d8.

[fiapps]

OK, so implicitly the answer is abicio, but there are still a lot of uses of abjicio, conjicio, dejicio, injicio, … left in the repo.

[APMarcello3]

Are they appearing in the Rubrics 1960 version? If so, please provide a list?

[fiapps]

I find them by searching the data files (try the regular expression \b(ab|con|de|in)j[ií]ci), so it would be easier to provide a PR changing them than a list of items to change. They may not all appear with the 1960 rubrics, but those using other rubrics will see inconsistent spelling if we don't follow the same convention in all texts. If you want to use a different convention with different rubrics, you should have the orthography adjusted by the code when producing output, like is done for j to i conversion. spell_var could split the non-HTML @parts into words, and replace words that occur in a dict mapping one style of spelling to the other.