appId vs domains

[DaWe35]

the example is confusing me because it named itself 'example-skapp' instead of 'skyacc'
also, it should talk about domains rather than the application itself
the text should probably read
"skyacc is requesting access to the domain 'example-domain', do you wish to give it access?"
and then probably a '?' button somewhere that explains what domains are and why apps need permissions to them and what the potential consequences are of giving permissions to a bad guy
maybe some text like
"Skynet applications can request access to different domains. If you give an application access to a domain, it can overwrite any data inside of the domain. This means a malicious app can potentially delete your data if you grant it permission. Applications can only access the domains you grant them access to. So for example, a note taking app might request access to the domain "notes". A different app which requests access to the "videos" domain will not be able to modify any of the data in the "notes" domain."

[vbylen]

Also a little confusing is that you have to 'grant access' every time you login.

Normally I'd expect that you only have to grant access once.

[BryantS11]

When you sign in with facebook, it lets you know that you have signed in with that website before. It then asks if you would like to continue and sign in.

This would be great for SkyID as it would cut down on phishing and let users know that it is the correct place that they are signing into.

[DaWe35]

Sure, it is possible to log in users without asking to access if `dapp url' == 'saved origin dapp url'. Makes sense!