Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restructure motivation section #47

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jlinx
Copy link
Collaborator

@jlinx jlinx commented Apr 11, 2024

Alexander (@astruck) and I did a rework of the complete "Motivation" chapter according to issue #4.

@jlinx jlinx requested a review from dokempf April 11, 2024 10:52
Copy link
Collaborator

@dokempf dokempf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the changes. At the same time, while reading the whole chapter again, I feel like there could be a stronger emphasis on motivating central RSE departments over motivating RSE in general, because that is the focus of our paper. But I guess it is fine to leave that to a future iteration.

@@ -83,125 +83,129 @@ \subsection{Terminology}

\section{Motivation}


\begin{quotation}
\textit{Better Software, Better Research}\\(Mission statement of the UK Software Sustainability Institute)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This slogan is under CC-BY. I once asked and they replied that I should use it with "copyrighted by Carole Goble and the Software Sustainability Institute under the CC-BY license: https://www.software.ac.uk/resources/publications/better-software-better-research". Should we make this a footnote then, instead of the the SSI mention in brackets?

@dokempf dokempf merged commit 55b31ab into main Apr 12, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants