About the documentation #17
-
|
Hi cor: Big thanks to you and develop team's effort ! Appreciate ! :) (and forgive my poor English) Best, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Hi, The way the filters work is identical to RegiStax6. I suggest looking at the (old but still valid) documentation of V6 (https://www.astronomie.be/registax/denoiseandsharpen.html). Unfortunately there is no "golden" setting for wavelet-settings, the settings need to be adapted for your image (based on camera/telescope setup) and the noise in the stacked image. Only by experimenting you will get a good feeling of what works and how. Many people have done so and its not difficult nor dangerous, images dont break ;) cheers |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi Cor: I know there is no "golden" setting. Just curious that if there is new operation method. Best, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi,
The way the filters work is identical to RegiStax6. I suggest looking at the (old but still valid) documentation of V6 (https://www.astronomie.be/registax/denoiseandsharpen.html). Unfortunately there is no "golden" setting for wavelet-settings, the settings need to be adapted for your image (based on camera/telescope setup) and the noise in the stacked image. Only by experimenting you will get a good feeling of what works and how. Many people have done so and its not difficult nor dangerous, images dont break ;)
cheers
Cor