Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get group membership faster. #58

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024
Merged

Get group membership faster. #58

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

ggreer
Copy link
Contributor

@ggreer ggreer commented Aug 19, 2024

For members where we already know the DN, just create the grant instead of fetching the user. For group membership by user id, we still have to hit the LDAP server.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a streamlined process for creating grants, enhancing efficiency by minimizing redundancy.
  • Improvements

    • Simplified grant creation logic, improving maintainability and readability in the handling of user grants.
  • Error Handling

    • Maintained robust error logging during user retrieval, ensuring reliability in grant processing.

For members where we already know the DN, just create the grant instead of fetching the user. For group membership by user id, we still have to hit the LDAP server.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The recent updates introduce a new function, newGrantFromDN, to simplify the creation of v2.Grant objects by centralizing the logic, reducing redundancy, and enhancing code clarity. As a result, the Grants method in the groupResourceType struct now utilizes this function for more streamlined grant generation. This change preserves existing error handling while improving overall maintainability.

Changes

Files Change Summary
pkg/connector/group.go Added newGrantFromDN function to streamline v2.Grant creation, reducing redundancy in the Grants method.

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
New grants hop along the way!
With less clutter, oh so bright,
We build our grants with pure delight.
A leap ahead, we dance and twirl,
In our code, watch joy unfurl! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a33b148 and 3854b7e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • pkg/connector/group.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
pkg/connector/group.go (2)

132-146: Well-structured function for grant creation.

The newGrantFromDN function is well-structured and effectively encapsulates the grant creation logic, enhancing maintainability and reducing redundancy.


Line range hint 147-239: Streamlined grant creation in Grants method.

The integration of newGrantFromDN into the Grants method effectively reduces redundancy and simplifies the control flow. Ensure that this change does not affect other parts of the codebase that rely on the previous grant creation logic.

Verification successful

Streamlined grant creation in Grants method verified.

The integration of newGrantFromDN into the Grants method has been verified and does not affect other parts of the codebase. The changes effectively reduce redundancy and simplify the control flow without impacting existing functionalities.

  • The Grants method in groupResourceType now uses newGrantFromDN for streamlined grant creation.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the new grant creation logic in `Grants` does not affect other parts of the codebase.

# Test: Search for usage of the `Grants` method. Expect: No issues with the new grant creation logic.
rg --type go -A 5 $'Grants'

Length of output: 282957

Copy link

@mgaeta mgaeta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good
It took me a second to get up to speed on what a DN was. Can you add a docstring to newGrantFromDN() that says something like

// newGrantFromDN - create a `Grant` from a given group and user distinguished name.
func newGrantFromDN(resource *v2.Resource, userDN string) *v2.Grant {

This might also be a good time to add a integration test for groups.

@ggreer
Copy link
Contributor Author

ggreer commented Aug 19, 2024

Our current CI tests do test granting/revoking group membership, so if this code did break that, the test would fail.

@ggreer ggreer merged commit d29dfb0 into main Aug 19, 2024
3 checks passed
@ggreer ggreer deleted the ggreer/faster-group-membership branch August 19, 2024 23:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants