Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: to_other_language cirq without QASM2.0 #119
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat: to_other_language cirq without QASM2.0 #119
Changes from all commits
64a75ae
b90e4c8
910ae08
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here we handle all the other cases ? (Parametrized gate, Barrier, BasisMeasure, ..) right ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cirq doesn't have a Barrier operation, so we skips it. breakpoints is also skip. While the rest is handled properly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, even BasisMeasure ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The BasisMeasure is a simple measurement with a pre-measurement circuit, we juste have to concatenate it. so yes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we concatenate this pre-measurement circuit (the one related with the basis change I suppose) somewhere? (because I checked the code, and I didn't found it).
But I ask myself if we should include that change of basis or not. I am not convinced personally, but if we do we have to warn the user. I would export the circuit without the change of basis additional unitary. What do you think ?