company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|79 col 262| Unexpected hard to read sentence, according to 5 out of 7 algorithms readability retext-readability
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|79 col 464| Unexpected hard to read sentence, according to 5 out of 7 algorithms readability retext-readability

company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|11 col 188| Unexpected hard to read sentence, according to 5 out of 7 algorithms readability retext-readability
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|17 col 513| Unexpected hard to read sentence, according to 6 out of 7 algorithms readability retext-readability
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|17 col 341| Unexpected potentially insensitive use of mental, in somes cases rude, malicious, mean, disgusting, incredible, vile, person with symptoms of mental illness, person with mental illness, person with symptoms of a mental disorder, person with a mental disorder may be better nuts retext-equality
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|17 col 678| Unexpected hard to read sentence, according to 5 out of 7 algorithms readability retext-readability
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|19 col 151| Unexpected hard to read sentence, according to 5 out of 7 algorithms readability retext-readability
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|23 col 233| Unexpected hard to read sentence, according to 5 out of 7 algorithms readability retext-readability
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|23 col 525| Unexpected hard to read sentence, according to 5 out of 7 algorithms readability retext-readability
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|23 col 357| Unexpected potentially insensitive use of mental, in somes cases rude, malicious, mean, disgusting, incredible, vile, person with symptoms of mental illness, person with mental illness, person with symptoms of a mental disorder, person with a mental disorder may be better nuts retext-equality
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|25 col 170| Unexpected hard to read sentence, according to 5 out of 7 algorithms readability retext-readability
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|25 col 30| Unexpected potentially insensitive use of disabled, in somes cases turned off, has a disability, person with a disability, people with disabilities may be better invalid retext-equality
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|25 col 404| Unexpected hard to read sentence, according to 5 out of 7 algorithms readability retext-readability
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|25 col 262| Unexpected potentially insensitive use of disabled, in somes cases turned off, has a disability, person with a disability, people with disabilities may be better invalid retext-equality
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|29 col 286| Unexpected potentially insensitive use of his, when referring to a person, in somes cases their, theirs, them may be better her-him retext-equality
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|29 col 290| Unexpected potentially insensitive use of her, when referring to a person, in somes cases their, theirs, them may be better her-him retext-equality
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|37 col 25| Unexpected potentially insensitive use of simply, try not to use it simple retext-equality
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|41 col 209| Unexpected hard to read sentence, according to 5 out of 7 algorithms readability retext-readability
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|49 col 241| Unexpected hard to read sentence, according to 5 out of 7 algorithms readability retext-readability
company-policies/employment/us/employment.md|53 col 268| Unexpected hard to read sentence, according to 5 out of 7 algorithms readability retext-readability