[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

common-practices-tools/contribution/contrib-first.md

@@ -53,7 +53,9 @@ Not typically. There are three significant offsets that make Contrib First the m
 Generally speaking, no it does not cost more. In total cost of ownership, contributed code is less expensive to maintain than custom code. Contributed code usually gets updated by update bots when there are changes needed. They make issues and merge requests automatically. The same code existing as custom code has to be updated by project personnel when the need for a change is discovered. In addition, with a broader user base, Open Source community members are more likely to uncover bugs or inefficiencies and provide improvements.
 
 <!--lint disable problem-->
+
 ## How de we decide between what is worth contributing and what is too specific to a project to have more general appeal?
+
 <!--lint enable problem-->
 
 Our engineers are pretty good at recognizing opportunities to re-use their work across multiple projects. This is especially true in the Government sector where agencies often have similar requirements. If we have even a hint that multiple agencies could benefit, we build it as contributed code first. If it starts out as something so specific to a given project that it can no be generalized, the we build it as custom code for that project. However we continually re-evaluate our custom code to see if, over time, it has become something that is worth contributing.