You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Many local/regional plans contract with national plans to offer secured rates for covered services nationwide.
Is a local/regional plan required to merge the national plan’s MRF into their In-Network MRF, which would create size, merging and updating challenges?
Or instead, could a local plan meet the In-network MRF requirements by linking to the applicable national plan’s MRF URL in the location where the local/regional plan’s In-Network MRF is published?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Stephanie-Raymond Would under the local plan a member be able to use the national plan's provider as a in-network provider for a negotiated rate as if they were a provider directly under the local plan (which I would think is yes)? If the answer is yes, then you would need to include the national in-network rates array data with the MRF generated by the local plan since they are considered under the one plan as in-network providers and not out of network providers.
This is why there has been a ongoing conversation for a while on the need to have a mechanism to reference in-network rates data because of the merging, storage and egress charges of a single monolithic file.
Many local/regional plans contract with national plans to offer secured rates for covered services nationwide.
Is a local/regional plan required to merge the national plan’s MRF into their In-Network MRF, which would create size, merging and updating challenges?
Or instead, could a local plan meet the In-network MRF requirements by linking to the applicable national plan’s MRF URL in the location where the local/regional plan’s In-Network MRF is published?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: