Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

First pass attempt at addressing #350 #491

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2025
Merged

Conversation

AndrewAnnex
Copy link
Owner

I probably will do another pass or two of this, but did a number of (approx 84) adjustments to doc strings to include unit descriptions for input or output parameters to address #350. Likely missed some and through time improved consistency in how I refer to ET parameters would be a good idea.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.86%. Comparing base (6d0168e) to head (5774ba3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #491   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.86%   99.86%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines       15635    15635           
=======================================
  Hits        15614    15614           
  Misses         21       21           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@AndrewAnnex AndrewAnnex merged commit bb52156 into main Feb 28, 2025
30 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant