Removing AdyenClient since it is not part of the model #53
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dcardos
requested review from
amihajlovski,
shanikantsingh,
shubhamk67,
ShubhamVijaivargiya and
zenit2001
as code owners
|
zenit2001
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2024
shubhamk67
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Describe the changes proposed in this pull request:
The AdyenClient class was being used by OMS to make callout, but it is impossible to set the headers correctly by this class, it is the Named Credential formula responsibility, that and the fact that this class is not actually a part of the model made this class unnecessary.
The use of the new Named Credential in OMS.